| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] |
181. "I squished a pod and I liked it" - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Quote: 1. Is it the faction poilice or concord that spawn in high sec for being -10? 2. I trust concord only spawns if you engage a victim? 3. What kind of time scale am I looking at to hang around a gate before I have to jump? 4. Will station...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.01.03 09:16:00
|
182. Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ho chiminh wrote: I don't consider it griefing, but still I mine in my main, please gank in yours. I gank using my main, because I love killing people who think they cannot be killed in Highsec. I'm not the only one either.
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.01.01 02:14:00
|
183. Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scaramanga Erquilenne wrote: Don't worry i have no Intention of doing this was just used as a example.Its just about risk and reward and loss ,These members of the new order have nothing to lose so hence they cant ever lose the only people who ...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.31 02:47:00
|
184. How bumping miners will have NO impact on bots - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Amelia Torez wrote: Want to know the most interesting thing about having those staff members? Paying 10 mil to keep a pirate at pay or updating a line in their bio to continue their mining undisturbed is a small price to price to allow their GÇ...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.30 01:30:00
|
185. Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I welcome your attempt to partake in emergent gameplay - thank you for proving that the New Order was right all along, that New Eden belongs to the strong, and not the weak (and most certainly not to those who cannot be bothered to remain at their...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.26 12:03:00
|
186. Introducing the New Order - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Scherezad wrote: I will admit that I do have some sympathy for your cause - inattentive pilots are careless pilots, and careless pilots are a deep hazard. I have no issue with your pursuit of recalcitrant pilots of any sort. My issue deals more...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.26 11:02:00
|
187. Introducing the New Order - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Nick Bete wrote: You petty racketeers can attempt to dress your "movement" up any way you like but, anyone over the Age of Consent recognizes you for what you truly are; yet another small time extortion racket preying on the weak. Your "code" i...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.24 07:26:00
|
188. Why do most afk while mining? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Zeko Rena wrote: I am actually kind of confused because you seem to want mining removed from the game No-one (at least not among the New Order that I know of) wants mining removed from the game. We want highsec miners to mine with a Permit -...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.18 23:38:00
|
189. Why do most afk while mining? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Zeko Rena wrote: Its gonna be pretty hard to keep buying and fitting ships for les than 2 million if no one did "bot/bot-aspriant gameplay" like mining, bro. Wow, that's a fantastic argument. Let's me see how many ganks that's prevented so f...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.18 22:54:00
|
190. Introducing the New Order - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Misha M'Liena wrote: I have noticed the New order. And the effect a wardec has on your savior. He just disbands his corp and remakes it, Then claims victory. Nice touch. For a coward. Yup i said it. Misha. Misha, Why do you argue that Jam...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.18 00:48:00
|
191. Introducing the New Order - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Tali Ambraelle wrote: And what is wrong with living in peaceful, solitary conditions? I think your friend may need to be checked by a medical facility for a case of capsuleer dementia. Nothing is "wrong" with living in peaceful, solitary c...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.18 00:23:00
|
192. Introducing the New Order - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Harry Willie wrote: LOL ... ok. Did you intend to contribute something meaningful to the discussion, or are you once again highlighting why resistance against the New Order has always failed? Do you intend to put action behind your words, or...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.13 01:12:00
|
193. Introducing the New Order - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Harry Willie wrote: [quote=Kainotomiu Ronuken]Actually, the New New Order has already arrived in Kamio and has already starting mowing down the Knights. They don't get pay outs for dieing in a fire without a kill to go with it, so I'm thinking ...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.13 00:16:00
|
194. Highsec "Carebear" representation from the CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: We need more people to VOTE if we want this game to live or the CSM will convince CCP that all people want is NULL crap. Then go out there and spread your message. Go into the highsec mission hubs, go to the ice belts, go ...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.12 00:48:00
|
195. Highsec "Carebear" representation from the CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: And you just identify yourself as a troll as soon as you suggest that guy as a high sec rep. To suggest a high sec griefer is a good rep for high sec would be the equivalent to suggest that a pedophile would be a good ...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.11 22:57:00
|
196. Highsec "Carebear" representation from the CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: And yeah, high sec DOES NEED its own reps. WE should have at least 3 of the 7, maybe 4, to have proper representation. And yes, agreed, these reps do need to understand all concepts of the game. But to infer that high s...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.11 22:35:00
|
197. Highsec "Carebear" representation from the CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: Except the value of high ends was balanced till they started to be over mined by people in Null. But sorry I dont call Null with its see of blues for some and local and anomalies you can hide in particularly risky, yes it is...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.11 22:30:00
|
198. Highsec "Carebear" representation from the CSM? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Amarra Mandalin wrote: Do you know how much return there is on a Catalyst? ;) Also, there is sec status to be considered unless you buy the killright. Not to mention having the warp-in point or some way to kill pirates who know effective game/a...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.11 06:50:00
|
199. Sticky:Miner Bumping: Discussion & Questions Thread - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Lady Cub wrote: Should Bumping be unbalanced and ultra easy.... NO. Is it currently Ultra easy and Unbalanced... YES.. = BROKEN and EXPLOITED. It is ultra easy because miners actively refuse to fight back. It's that simple, and this is the h...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.05 08:08:00
|
200. Sticky:Miner Bumping: Discussion & Questions Thread - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Joesph Jovakko wrote: However, his writings also indicate that he holds miners in contempt and it is this contempt that frames the interaction. It is one thing to claim ownership of a high-sec systems and demand a GÇ£mining feeGÇ¥. This is how ...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2012.12.02 22:45:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |